CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT SEISMIC PERFORMANCES UPGRADING OF RC BUILDINGS USING CFRP WRAPPING.
PDF

Keywords

CFRP wrapping
pushover analysis
seismic retrofitting
Plastic hinge

How to Cite

DROUNA , K., & DJEBBAR , N. (2020). CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT SEISMIC PERFORMANCES UPGRADING OF RC BUILDINGS USING CFRP WRAPPING. Journal of Sciences & Technology , 4(2), 15-22. Retrieved from http://revue.umc.edu.dz/index.php/st/article/view/3234

Abstract

Knowing that the rehabilitation practice in Algeria is not codified yet, the principal aim of this paper is to evaluate seismic performance of retrofitted reinforced concrete buildings by CFRP wrapping using a Pushover analysis to estimate the structural capacity in both strength and ductility. A nonlinear analysis is conducted on a series of low-rise buildings with poor concrete strength of their vertical components where the CFRP wrapping is adopted as a rehabilitation solution. An explanation of the simulation work before and after the retrofitting operation is given through the modeling approach of the nonlinear sectional behavior based on a combination of confining effects, helping in Moment-Curvature analysis and user defined plastic hinges modeling. Finally, seismic performance enhancement is evaluated in local and global behavior considering several structural criteria.

PDF

References

Nonlinear static analysis of retrofitted RC building, A. Ismail. 1687-4048 © 2013Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V.. http://dx.doi.org/2013.07.002

On the pushover analysis as a method for evaluating the seismic response of RC buildings. P. P. Diotallevi & L. Landi Depart. of Civil Eng. DISTART, Bologna University, Italy Earthquake Resistant Eng. Structures V203, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, Vol 81, © 2005 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509

Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Turkey. Inel M, et al Eng. Structures 2007.

Considerations about non linear static analysis of a RC frame retrofitted with FRP. M. Savoia et al. Mecánica Computacional Vol XXIX. 10173-10182 Buenos Aires, Argentina, 15-18 Nov. 2010 http://www.amcaonline

SAP 2000, Integrated software for Structural analysis & design, Computers & Structures, Inc, Berkeley, USA.

RPA 99. Version 2003, Algerian Seismic code.

Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading. Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1987). ACI Struct. J., 84(1), 61–67.

On the effect of external active confinement on spirally RC columns, H. Moghaddam, et al. The 14thWorld Conf. on Earth. Eng. Oct 12-17, 2008 Beijing, China.14th WCEE.

.CFRP confined square columns in cyclic axial compression, stress-strain model, Wang Z, Wang D, Smith ST, Lu D. ASCE. J. Compos. Constr. 2012: 16(2). 161-70.

Models for FRP-wrapped rectangular RO columns with continuous or lap-spliced bars under cyclic lateral loading. Biskinis D, Fardis MN, Engineering Structures 57 (2013) 199-212;0141-0296 -© 20 Elsevier Ltd.

Fib model code 2010 – Final draft. Bulletin 65/66. Federation Internatinale du Béton. Lausanne; 2012

FEMA – 356 Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. 2000 Washington DC.

Seismic performances of existing buildings strengthened by RC jacketing. Application of the pushover analysis. Karima Drouna, Djebbar Nabil. 2ndECEES 24-29 August 2014, Istanbul Turkey. http://www.eaee.org/proceed ings-of-2ecees-eaee-sessions

Plastic Hinge Length of FRP-Confined Square RC Columns. Cheng Jiang, Yu-Fei Wu, and Gang Wu; DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000463. 2014 ASCE.

Seismic design of RC and masonry buildings, Paulay T and Priestley M 1992, J. Wiley and sons, New York 1992.

“Performance modeling strategies for modern RC bridge columns.” Berry, M. P. 2006. PhD thesis, Univ. of Washington.

“Flexure-controlled ultimate deformations of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars.” Biskinis, D., and Fardis, M. N. Struct.Concr. 2010, 11(2),93–108.

“Plastic hinge analysis of FRP confined circular concrete columns.” Gu, D. S., Wu, Y. F., Wu, G., and Wu, Z. S. Constr. Build. Mater, 2012, 27(1), 223–233.

‘Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings.’ A.M.Mwafy, A.S.Elnashai, Engineering Structures 23 2001 407-424

Scott, M.H.; Fenves, G.L.; McKenna, F.; Filippou, F.C. Software patterns for nonlinear beam-column models.J. Struct. Eng. 2008, 134, 562–571.

Detailing procedures for seismic rehabilitation of RC members with fiber reinforced polymers, Tastani S.P, Pantazopoulou S.J, Eng. Structures. 0141-0296 -© 20 Elsevier Ltd. Doi: 10.1016/ j.engstruct.2007.03.028.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Array

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.