The Usefulness of Grammar for Writing

Authors

  • Abdelhak NEMOUCHI Department of Foreign Languages Université Mentouri Constantine

Abstract

The present study investigates the rates of correlation between grammar and writing as revealed by the students’ grades, in the department of Foreign Languages at the University of Constantine. Our study is based on an analysis of students’ marks of grammar and writing obtained over four semesters in 2005 and 2006, since the LMD system was implemented. The comparative analysis of the two subjects seeks to determine how far the teachings in grammar are reflected in those of writing, and whether a student skilled in grammar is inevitably good at writing. Measuring the   degree of connection between the components of the same Teaching Unit is dictated by the supposedly natural coherence and articulation existing between them.  Before classifying two or more subjects within the same Teaching Unit, one should confirm how deep they are connected. The remote objective of such a study would be the adaptation of the appropriate approach to the contents designed

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Abdelhak NEMOUCHI, Department of Foreign Languages Université Mentouri Constantine

Department of Foreign Languages

 

References

- Barton, Geoff. 1997. Grammar without Shame. Use of English 48, (107-18)

- Bryant, P., M. Devine, A. Ledward, and T. Nunes. 1997 Spelling with apostrophes and understanding possession. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67, (91-110)

- Elley, W.B. 1994. Grammar Teaching and Language Skill. Oxford: OUP.

- English Review Group. The effect of grammar teaching (syntax) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition. June 2004. University of London. 27 June 2007 http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWebContent/reel/review_groups/english/ eng_rv6/eng_rv6.pdf

- Halliday, MAK. 1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, (2nd ed), London: Longman.

- Harris, R.J. 1962. An Experimental Inquiry into The Functions and Value of the Teaching of Formal Grammar in the Teaching of English. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of London. London.

- Heap, Brian. 1991. Evaluating the effects of an LA course. Language Awareness in the Classroom. Eds. James, Carl; Garrett, Peter. London: Longman. (247-53)

- Hillocks, G. Jr. 1986. Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. Urbana.

- Mason, Mary, and Robert Mason. 1997. Breakthrough to Learning. Linguistics in the service of mainstream education. University of Central England Faculty of Education Papers: Issues in Education Series, No. 2.

- Mccleary, B. 1995. Grammar making a comeback in composition teaching. Composition Chronicle: Newsletter for Writing Teachers.

- Schleppegrell, M.J. 2003. Grammar for Writing: Academic languages and the ELD Standards. University of California. May 2007.

- Thompson, A. in EPPI Centre Review’. 1969. The effect of Grammar in English. June 2004. EPPI Review. London.

- Walmsley, J. 1984. “The Uselessness of Formal Grammar?” Committee for Linguistics Education Working Papers 2, New York.

- Weaver, Constance. 1996. Teaching Grammar in Context. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Published

2007-12-01

How to Cite

NEMOUCHI, A. (2007). The Usefulness of Grammar for Writing. Journal of Human Sciences , 18(3), 57–66. Retrieved from https://revue.umc.edu.dz/h/article/view/861

Issue

Section

Articles