التحوّل الرقمي وأثره على الخصوصية الفردية: سؤال الحدود والأطر السوسيوقانونية

بلقاسم أمين بن عمرة

doi:10.34174/f5e9eg41

Authors

Belkacem Amin Benamra University of Bouira (Algeria)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34174/f5e9eg41

Keywords:

Digital transformation, Digital spaces, Individual privacy, Socio-legal, frameworks

Abstract

The current study aimed to approach the various socio-legal and technical stakes presented by digital technologies and- their usage expansion in the individual and collective landscape of users- on the concept of privacy as a principle and as a practice from a critical and meta-theoretical angle. The first part of the study focused on investigating the epistemological connotations and ontological conditions of the concept of privacy and trying to delimit its precise meaning within its lexical and terminological scope. It also explored the historical and chronological contexts of privacy's evolution from an abstract philosophical concept to an institutionalized right, including the legal frameworks and procedures that have shaped and supported this transition. The study addressed equally, from a comprehensive and investigative perspective, the challenges and threats posed by digital transformations to individuals’ rights to privacy within the interconnected, especially in light of the overarching trend towards dependence on digital technologies, in which the level of transparency is critically diminishing, as well as the effective and sufficient measures to safeguard privacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Md Toriqul Islam, Abu Bakar Munir, Siti Hajar Mohd Yasin and Ershadul Karim. Data Protection Law in Asia. International Data Privacy Law, Volume 8, Issue 4, November 2018, p.338–340,

Holmes Aaron. Hackers have Become so Sophisticated that nearly 4 billion Records have been Stolen from People in the Last Decade Alone. Here are the 10 Biggest Data Breaches of the 2010s’ Business Insider (New York, 13 October 2019), https://www.businessinsider.com/biggest-hacks-2010s-facebook-equifax-adobe-marriott-2019-10

Bethesda MD. Marriott International Notifies Guests of Property System Incident. Marriott News (31 March 2020), https://news.marriott.com/news/2020/03/31/marriott-international-notifies-guests-of-property-system-incident

Cerruto, Francesca, et al. Cross-Social Network Investigation to Highlight Privacy Violations in Data Sharing Activities. J Big Data. Vol. 9. No.19 .2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-022-00566-7

Westin A. Privacy and freedom. New York, NY : Atheneum. 1967.p.05.

Thomson JJ. The right to privacy. Philos. Public Affairs 4.1975.p.295.

Solove DJ. Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press. 2008.p.09.

. Post RC. Three concepts of privacy. Georgetown Law J. 89.2000.p. 2087.

DeCew, J. W. In pursuit of privacy: Law, ethics, and the rise of technology. Cornell University Press. 1997.p.08.

Gavison R.Privacy and the Limits of Law. (1980) 89 The Yale Law Journal 421.

Westin A. Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy. (2003) 59 Journal of Social Issues 2.

Allen, Anita L. Coercing privacy. Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 40. 1998.p. 723.

Prosser WL. Privacy. 48 California Law Review.1960.p. 383.

Parker RB. A Definition of Privacy. 27 Rutgers Law Review.1974).pp.275 281.

Bloustein, E. J. Privacy as an Aspect of HumanDignity: an Answer to Dean Prosser. New York University Law Review Vol. 39, 1964. p. 973.

Posner, R. A.The Right of Privacy. Georgia Law Review Vol. 12, No. 3. (1978) p. 409

Westin, A. F. Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues Vol 59, No. 2. (2003) pp. 431-434

Fried, C.: Privacy. TheYale Law Journal Vol. 77, No. 3. 1968.p. 486.

Solove, D. J. Nothing toHide: the False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security. New Haven & London : Yale University Press, 2011. p. 39.

Westin, A. F. Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues Vol 59, No. 2. (2003) p.431.

Ojakangas, M. (2020). Polis and Oikos: The Art of Politics in the Greek City-State. The European Legacy, 25(4), 404–420.

Regan, Priscilla M. Legislating privacy: Technology, social values, and public policy. University of North Carolina Press, 1995.p.46.

Seipp, David J. The right to privacy in nineteenth century America. Harvard Law Review. Vol 94. No.8.1981.

Bezanson, Randall P. The right to privacy revisited: Privacy, news, and social change, 1890-1990. Calif. L. Rev. 80. 1992.p.1133.

Davies, Kathleen J. Write to privacy: Literature, letters, law, and the inviolate personality in America's long nineteenth century. Diss. University of Pittsburgh, 2016.

Davies, S. G. Re-Engineering the Right to Privacy: How Privacy Has Been Transformed from a Right to a Commodity, in Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, P. E. Agre and M. Rotenberg (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1997. pp. 143-165.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted 10 December 1948 UNGA Res 217 A(III) (UDHR) art 12.

Buergenthal T.The American Convention on Human Rights: Illusions and Hopes. 1971. 21 Buffalo Law Review 122.

Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners. International Standards on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy: The Madrid Resolution. (2009) art.2, available at : http://privacyconference2011.org/htmls/adoptedResolutions/2009_Madrid/2009_M1.pdf

Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (adopted 18 November 2012), art 21,available at : https://www.refworld.org/docid/50c9fea82.html

ASEAN. Framework on Personal Data Protection (2016), art.6 available at : https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/10-ASEAN-Framework-on-PDP.pdf.

Van Alsenoy B. Regulating Data Protection: The Allocation of Responsibility and Risk among Actors Involved in Personal Data Processing. DPhil thesis, KU Leuven University .2016.

Council of Europe. A Convention to Protect Your Rights and Liberties. https://www.coe.int/en/web/human-rights-convention, accessed 16 February 2023.

Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5, art 8, https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf

EU Commission. Statement by Vice-President Ansip and Commissioner Jourová Ahead of the Entry into Application of the General Data Protection Regulation. (24 June 2018), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/STATEMENT_18_3889.

صفية بشاتن، الحماية القانونية للحياة الخاصة: دراسة مقارنة. رسالة لنيل شهادة دكتوراه العلوم، تخصص: قانون،كلية الحقوق والعلوم السياسية، جامعة مولود معمري، تيزي وزو، 2012، ص 93.

أحسن بوسقيعة، قانون العقوبات في ضوء الممارسة القضائية، وفق تعديلات 20 ديسمبر 2006 مدعم بالاجتهاد القضائي، منشورات بيرتي،الجزائر، 2008، ص 137.

قانون رقم 06-23 مؤرخ في29 ذي القعدة عام 1427 الموافق 20 ديسمبر سنة 2006، يعدل ويتمم الأمر رقم 66-155 المؤرخ في 18 صفر عام 1386 الموافق 8 يونيو سنة 1966 والمتضمن قانون الإجراءات الجزائية. ج. ر. ع 84، الصادر في 4 ذو الحجة عام 1427ه الموافق 24 ديسمبر سنة 2006م.

ZHANG, Chi, SUN, Jinyuan, ZHU, Xiaoyan, et al. Privacy and security for online social networks: challenges and opportunities. IEEE network, 2010, vol. 24, no 4, p. 13-18.

Omer Tene. What Google Knows: Privacy and Internet Search Engines. Utah Law Review 1433; Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, ‘Opinion 1/2008 on data protection issues related to search engines’, (WP 148),4 April 2008, available at : <http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2008/wp148_en.pdf>

Olano J, .The Struggle to Define Privacy Rights and Liabilities in a Digital World and the Unfortunate Role of Constitutional Standing. 2018. University of Miami Law Review 1025.

Patrick Van Eecke, Maarten Truyens. Privacy and social networks. Computer Law & Security Review. 2020. Vol.26. No.5. p.535-546.

Gail-Joon Ahn, Mohamed Shehab, Anna Squicciarini. Security and Privacy in Social Networks. IEEE Internet Computing; 2011; vol .15. No.3.pp.10- 12.

Brough, Aaron R., and Kelly D. Martin. Consumer privacy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 2021, vol. 40, no 1, p. 108-110.

Taddicken, Monika. The privacy paradox’in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2014, vol. 19, no 2, p. 248-273.

Gies, S. V., Piquero, N. L., Piquero, A. R., Green, B., & Bobnis, A. (2021). Wild, wild theft: Identity crimes in the digital frontier. Criminal justice policy review, 32(6), 592-617.

Bolster, L. C. (2019). Trust and Data. Governing Cyberspace during a Crisis in Trust. p.26.

TORN, I. A. R. et VANEKER, Thomas HJ. Mass Personalization with Industry 4.0 by SMEs: A concept for collaborative networks. Procedia manufacturing, 2019, vol. 28, p. 135-141.

LEE, Hau L., ZHANG, Hongtao, VAN WASSENHOVE, Luk N., et al. Production and operations management. Production and Operations Management, 2019, vol. 5, no 1, p. 25-41.

Pizzi, Gabriele, and Daniele Scarpi. Privacy threats with retail technologies: A consumer perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2020, vol. 56, p. 102-160.