On the correlation between semantics and syntax

Authors

  • Nacira HOCINE Université of Tizi-Ouzou Département des Langues Etrangères Tizi-Ouzou

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation between semantics and syntax by looking at complement – taking verbs and complement sentences in three different languages: French, English and Modern standard Arabic (MSA).

                Our aim is to describe the semantic classes of complement-taking verbs and the syntactic structures of complement sentences in order to delimit some idiosyncratic features in each language under discussion, and show to what extent the three languages are comparable. Moreover, the semantic classification of complement-taking verbs where some semantic properties of verbs in English, French and MSA are analysed, showed some rough similarities and differences in the behaviour of complement – taking verbs in the three languages.

Furthermore, we have tired to show through semantic classifications and sub-classification of verbs that the claim syntactic structures of complements are determined by semantic properties of main verb "is not axiomatic" because of the "loose" correlation between semantics and syntax. As there is no one-to-one correspondence between the syntactic structures of complements and semantic features of verbs, it is sometimes difficult to ascribe semantic regularities for verbs and syntactic patterns for complement sentences, especially at a cross-linguistic level

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nacira HOCINE, Université of Tizi-Ouzou Département des Langues Etrangères Tizi-Ouzou

Département des Langues   Etrangères

References

 Aartun K., (1981). "Sentences with Specific Particles and the Subjunctive in Arabic" in Oriens, 27,28, pp. 313-316.

 Aichison J., (1992). Linguistics. Hodders and Stoughton.

 Al-Ani S.-H., (1978). Reading in Arabic Linguistics, Indiana U., U.S.A.

 Allerton D.-J., (1982). Valency and the English Verb. Academic Press, London and New York.

 Benveniste C.-B., (1981). "La complementation verbale: Valence, Rection et Associés in Recherches sur le français parlé", 3, pp. 57-98.

 Connon U., (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric Cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing, Cambridge: London.

 Downing A., & Locke P., (1992). A University Course in English Grammar, International Language Teaching, Prentice Hall.

 Greest W.-J., & Putseys Y., (1984). Sentential Complementation, Dordrecht, Holland, Cinnaminson, U.S.A.

 Kiparsky P., & Kiparsky C., (1970). "Fact" in Bierwisch, M. and Heidolph K., Progress in Linguistics.

 Shopen T., (1985). Language Typology and Syntactic Constructions: Complex Constructions, Cambridge UP, London and New York.

Published

2000-12-01

How to Cite

HOCINE, N. (2000). On the correlation between semantics and syntax. Journal of Human Sciences , 11(2), 55–60. Retrieved from https://revue.umc.edu.dz/h/article/view/1149

Issue

Section

Articles