Participation, worker’s control and self - management
الملخص
Participation of the workers in management is one of the issues that has been extensively discussed in industrialized countries. Many experiments on participation have been acheived throughtout the century. Participation is currently at the heart of interest and discussions in these countries. Suprisingly despite this importance it is almost unknown in the third world, espessially in Arab countries which gives the present article a particular importance. I hope readers and researchers in these contries will find in it a source of information about this topic.
The article puts a particular emphasis on the conceptual discussion of the terms of participation, workers’ control and self-management, and shows that these concepts present also differences in methods and scope of research. Experiments on workers’ participation which have been successively carried out since the turn of the century, show the extent of the generalization of industrial democracy and the effeciency of participation in solving many of the problems faced by the entreprises in acheiving their tasks.
Finally the article analyses the idea of those opposing workers participation and the excuses they advance in refusing this type of workers-management relations.
التنزيلات
المراجع
- Ondrak, 1987, Quoted in Gyôrgy Széll. Participation , Workers' Control and self-management, Sage publications, Bristol G.B 1988, p75
- Jenkins, David, Job power :Blue and white Collar Democracy, Heinmann London , 1974,p1.
- Alexandar Heron, why men work , 1948. quoted in G.Fried mann, The anatomy of work, London , free Press, 1961. p35.
- G.D.H. Cole collectivism , syndicalism and Guilds , in D.Jenkins Job power , op . cit. p60.
- Dorow, Wolfgang (ed), The business corporation in the democratic society, New york , de Gruyter , 1987, p IX.
- Ernie Roberts ; Trade Union and Workers' control in K.Coate and Tony Topham The New Unionism : The case for workers' control Penguin Books, Middlessex , 1974 , p56.
- J.M. Clerc; Workers' participation in management : Some Preliminary consideration in W.Albeda (ed) INdustrial Democratic in three European countries Rotterdam, Rotterdam university Press, 1973, p10.
- Keith Davis "Human Relations in business" New york , Mc Graw-hill, 1957, p288.
- G.M.Clearc , "Participation and productivity with Special Reference to the Scanlon Plan " in C.P. Thakur and K.C Sethi " industrial Democracy : Some Issues and Experiences " New Delhi , Shri Ram Centre ; 1976, p206.
- J.R.P French Jnr. et al, " An experiment in participation in a Norwegian Factory " Human Relations No 13, 1960, p3.
- R. Sawtell , Sharing our industrial future, London, The Industrial Society, 1968, p1.
- J.C.Lammers Powers and participation in Dicision Making in Formal Organisations quoted by C. Pateman Participation and Democratic Theory , London Combridge University Press, 1974, p67.
- D.Mc George " The Human side of enterprise" New York, Mc Graw-Hill, 1960, p 130.
- E.H.Stephen , "The politics of workers' participation : The peruvian Ap
- proach in comparative perspective" New york, Academic Press Inc, 1980, p3 Poole, Michael, Workers' participation in industry , London , Ooutlrdge and Kegan Paul , 1978, Quoted in G.Széll op.cit ,p 83.
- Ibid , p83.
- Y.Bourder and A.Guillerm , L'Autogestion , Paris, Editions Seghers, 1977, p 18.
- Kenneth F.Walker, Worlers' participation in management in practice an international perspective , in C.P. Thakur and K.C. Sethi (eds) International democracy : Some issues and experiences op cit , p 228.
- Hugh Scanlon, "Workers' Participation symposium" quoted in T.Clark and L.Clements (eds) "Trade union under capitalism" Glasgow, Fontana / Collins, 1977, p 356.
- Keneth F. Walker , op cit , p 228.
- G.Stranss and E.Rosentein "Workers' participation : A critical view in industrial relations , No=9 ,1970, p p 197-214.
- Coates Ken and Tony Topham (eds) "Workers' control" A book of reading and writeness for workers' control. London , Panther, 1970, p 361-2.
- B. Pribicevie , The shop Stewards' movement and Workers' control Quoted by M.Poole Workers' Participation in Industry , London, Routledge and Paul Kegan, 1975, p.102.
- Hunnius . G, Garson . D and Case.J (eds) Workers' control reader on Labour and Social change , New York , Vintage Books , 1973, p IX.
- K.Coates and T.Topham The New Unionism : The case for Workers' control , Harmondsworth , Middlesex, Penguin, p60.
- Ibid
- M.Poole "Workers' participation in Industry" op cit, p152 .
- J.Y. Tabb and A.Goldfard "Workers' participation in management : Expectations and Experience" Exeter, A.Wheaton and Co, 1970, p.7.
- I.Adizes and E.M.Borgese , Self management : New Dimenssions to democracy , Santa Barbara , California, The Fund for the Republic, 1974; p7.
- E.Blum On some Aspect of the devlopment of self management in Yugoslavia in C.P.Thakur and K.C.Sethi Industrial democracy op cit , p300.
- Paul Blumberg "Industrial Democracy : The Sociology of participation" London , Constable , 1968, p 123.
- R.Lippit and R.K.White "An experimental study of leadership and Group life" in G.E.Swangon , T.M.Newcomb and E.L.Hartly (eds) readings in social Psychology New York , Holt , 1952, pp 340-355.
- S.K.Roy "Participative Management in public industry : Organisational Groupwork necessary " in C.P.Thakur and Sethi (eds) Industrial Democracy : Some issues and experiences op cit , p 58.
- Tarrab Gilbert and Pierre D'Aragon . participation in business : Is it Viable? under what sircumstances? in R.N.Stern and S.Mc.Carthy (eds), 1986, p229.
- L.Coch and §J.R.P.French Jnr . Overcoming resistence to change in Swanson et al: readings in Social Psychology op cit , pp 474-490.
- Clegg's opinion and arguments are developed in his major works . Industrial Democracy and Nationalization , 1951and A new Approach to industrial democracy , 1960.
- Hugh A.Clegg Industrial democracy and nationalization , Oxford, 1951, p 14.
- Ibid.
- Ibid , p 121.
- Ibid , p73.
- Hugh A.Clegg A new approach to industrial democracy, Oxford, Blackwell 1960, p 21.
- Ibid , p29.
- Clegg has been criticised by many writers especially on the analogy he draws between union as opposition in the industrial setting and opposition of political parties to the government . In democratic political systems. A political party can, if it wins election, take the place of the government and the government becomes the opposition group. But this is surely unacceptable by Clegg for the union whom he believes should always remain in opposition and can never take the management's place . See example , Ken Coates and T.Topham , New Unionism, op cit and P.Blumberg , Industrial democracy,
