Applying the Semantics of Spatial Prepositions and Error Correction to Teach the Spatial Prepositions “In” and “On

Authors

  • Assma ATHMANI University of Mentouri Constantine

Keywords:

Semantics, Spatial Prepositions, Error Correction, Teach, In, On

Abstract

Most teachers of English as a foreign language agree that a great number of learners use spatial prepositions inadequately and, despite the different techniques used in teaching them, most learners still consider learning the use of these prepositions one of the most problematic issues. The reason could be the various and close meanings and uses of each spatial preposition. Throughout this article, we will introduce the notion of the semantics of spatial prepositions (an organised and structured presentation of prepositions suggested by Cognitive Grammar), its importance and the semantics of both spatial prepositions in and on, in addition to an overview of the different types of error correction that can be used in the Grammar  class. The results presented in this paper will show whether using error correction, presenting the semantics of spatial prepositions or using both techniques in combination would help teachers and students at the Department of English at the University of Constantine 1 in teaching and learning the spatial prepositions in and on.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Assma ATHMANI, University of Mentouri Constantine

Faculty of Letters and Languages , Department of Letters and English

References

Boers, F. &Demecheleer, M. (1998). A cognitive semantic approach to teachingprepositions.

ELT Journal Volume 52/3, pp.197-204.Oxford UniversityPress.

Brown, D. H. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, Fifth Edition. Hite Plains, New York: PearsonEducation.

Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. 1999.The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2ndEd.). Boston:Heinle&Heinle.

Ellis, R. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency.

Language Teaching Research, 2,1-23.

Ferris, D. (2003). Responding to Students’ Writing: Implications for Second-Language students. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.

Garrod, S.; Ferrier, G. & Campbell, S. (1999). In and on: investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition 72, 167-189.Elsevier.

Hedge, T. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom: A Guide to Current Ideas about the Theory and Practice of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Herskovits, A. (1985). Semantics and Pragmatics of Locative Expressions. Cognitive Science 9(3);pp.341-378.

Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and Spatial Cognition: an Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar,Evolution.

Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: a Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2005). Error Correction: Students’ Versus Teachers’ Perceptions. LanguageAwareness14:2-3,112-127.

Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English Prepositions Explained (Revised edition). Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins.

Luraghi, S. (2003). On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Philadelphia: John Benjamins PublishingCompany.

Ortega, L. (2009). Sequences and processes in language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 81-105). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Penston, T. (2005). Concise Grammar for English Language Teachers. Ireland: TP Publications.

Pütz, M. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, pp.1139-1159. New York: Oxford UniversityPress.

Savage, K. L.; Bitterlin, G. & Price, D. 2010.Grammar Matters. New York: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10:3,p.209-231.

Talmy, L. (2003). Concept Structuring Systems in Language. In Michael Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure Vol. 2, pp.15-46. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Truscott, J. (2001). Selecting Errors for Selective Error Correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27,93-108.

Tyler, A. & Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meanings and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Tyler, J. R. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics and Autonomous Linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts& HubertCuyckens(Eds.),TheOxfordHandbookofCognitiveLinguistics,pp.566-

Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-01

How to Cite

ATHMANI, A. (2016). Applying the Semantics of Spatial Prepositions and Error Correction to Teach the Spatial Prepositions “In” and “On. Journal of Human Sciences , 27(1), 05–20. Retrieved from https://revue.umc.edu.dz/h/article/view/2331

Issue

Section

Articles