Connective Expressions as Metadiscourse Markers of Writing Quality in Undergraduate Students’ Expository Writing
Abstract
This article examines third year students’ expository writing and the use of conjunctive expressions (connectives) as markers of good quality essays which is measured in terms of conjunctive expressions’ appropriate use and density, and is reflected by the teachers’ assigned scores to the students’ essays. The expository essays were analyzed for connectives’ use by adopting Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) taxonomy of conjunctive cohesion. The expository essays were divided into two groups, highly scored essays (above 12) and poorly scored essays (below10) to test the correlation between the use of connectives and the quality of essays, reflected by marks. The results show that when students use lot of connective expressions , the quality of their writing will not be good, but when they use a little of connective expressions, the quality of their writing will be good. Accordingly, the hypothesis upon which the research is based, that there is a positive relationship between connective expressions’ use in terms of frequency and appropriacy, and the students’ writing quality, showed negative results and the hypothesis was not, thus, confirmed.Downloads
References
- Baker, M. 1992 (2ndEdn.). In Other Words. New York: Routledge.
- Brown, G. & G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Byrne, D. 1988. Teaching Writing Skills. London: Longman Group U.K.
- French, S. & J. Sim. 1993. Writing: A Guide for Therapists. Elsevier Health Sciences.
- Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Harris, P. etal. 2003.Writing in the Primary School Years. Thomson Learning Nelson.
- Kranz, G. 2007. Communicating Effectively-Write, Speak and Present with Authority.
- McCarthy, M. 1991. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mora-Flores, E. 2008. Writing Instruction for English Learners: A Focus on Genre. Corwin Press.
- Nero, S. J. 2006. Dialects, Englishes, Creoles, and Education. New York: Routledge.
- Oakes, M. P. 1998. Statisticsfor Corpus Linguistics. Edimburgh University Press.
- Pilus, Z. 1993. “Considerations in Developing Materials for the Teaching of Writing at the Pro-University Level.” in The English Teacher. Vol. XXII.
- Ramasawmy, N. 2004. Conjunctive Cohesion and Relational Coherence in Students' Compositions. Unpublished Ph.D.
- Spence, C. M. et al. 2008. The Joys of Teaching Boys: Igniting Writing Experiences that Meet the Needs of All Students. PembrokePublishers Limited.
- Tribble, C. 1996. Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Urdan, T.C. 2005 (2ndEdn.). Statistics in Plain English. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Weigle, S. C. 2002. Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Witt, S. &Faigley, L.(1981).Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 189-204.
