A Contrastive Rhetoric of Algerian Students’ Use of Connectivity

Auteurs-es

  • Mokhtar HAMADOUCHE University of Constantine 1

Mots-clés :

Algerian Students, Connectivity

Résumé

As every speech community may have unique codes for oral communication, it may also have some culture-specific rhetorical patterns and organizational modes in terms of written language. Accordingly; when relying on their first language writing conventions to write in the target language, foreign language learners will face difficulties in conforming to the latter’s stylistic standards, regardless to their grammatical and lexical proficiency. The present paper provides a contrastive rhetoric investigation of Algerian university students’ use of connectivity across their Arabic and English writing to see whether they reach a rhetorical style closer to that of the target language, or they keep relying on their Arabic rhetorical strategies to write in English. Results revealed that students used the targeted features in a similar pattern in the two languages, and this clearly demonstrates the role of the first language in students’ target language writing.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Mokhtar HAMADOUCHE, University of Constantine 1

Department of Letters and English Language
Faculty of Letters and Languages

Références

- Abu Radwan, A. (2012). Rhetoric transfer in L2 writing: The role of second language proficiency. Arab World English Journal, 3(2), 365-399.

- Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Connor, U. (2002). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 493-510.

- Hamadouche, M. (2013). Intercultural studies in the Arab world from a contrastive rhetoric perspective. Arab World English Journal, 2nd Special Issue on Translation, 181-188.

- Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20.

- Koch, B, J. (1987). Parataxis in Arabic: Modification as a model for persuasion. Studies in Language, 11(1), 85-98.

- Shaheen, M. (1991). Theories of translation and their application to the teaching of English/Arabic. Amman, Jordan: Dar Al – Thaqafa Library.

- Qaddumi, M. K. H. (1995). Textual deviation and coherence problems in the writings of Arab students at the University of Bahrain: Sources and solutions. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. University of Nottingham: Nottingham, UK.

- Williams, M. P. (1989). A comparison of the textual structures of Arabic and English written texts: A Study in the comparative orality of Arabic. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. University of Leeds, Leeds: UK.

- Xing, M., Wang, J., & Spencer, K (2008). Raising students' awareness of cross-cultural contrastive rhetoric in English writing via an e-learning course. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 71-93.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2014-12-01

Comment citer

HAMADOUCHE, M. (2014). A Contrastive Rhetoric of Algerian Students’ Use of Connectivity. Revue Des Sciences Humaines, 25(3), 95–104. Consulté à l’adresse https://revue.umc.edu.dz/h/article/view/2020

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles

Articles similaires

<< < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> 

Vous pouvez également Lancer une recherche avancée d’articles similaires à cet article.