The Problem of Separating Administrative Decisions Linked to the Administrative Contract Establishing Them

Feriel KRIKOU

doi:10.34174/z67ejy57

Auteurs-es

Feriel KRIKOU Faculty of Law, University of Constantine 1, Algeria

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.34174/z67ejy57

Mots-clés :

Mixed acts, administrative process, separate administrative, decision, annulment appeal, cancellation appeal

Résumé

For an administrative judge to be able to rule on the review presented to him, it is necessary to determine whether the subject matter of the dispute is connected (RATTACHALLEZ) to one of the administrative processes within his jurisdiction first. Ensuring the existence of connection (RATTACHEMENT) is essential for him. Hence, the administrative judge had to devise the theory of connected acts to solve the problem of determining the legal system and competent jurisdiction, as well as identifying the components of the administrative process that require specialized adjudication of disputes that may arise therein.

Téléchargements

Les données de téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponible.

Références

1. Decision of the Supreme Court issued. (1996). BLIDA: the case of Mr. B.M. v. Municipality of Tessala Marjeh.

2. AbdelHamidl, H. K. (s.d.). Detachable Decisions and Comparative Management Contracts in Egyptian and French Law.Cairo: Dar Al-Arabiya.

3. accordance with the French decree issued. (1945). For example in France the organizational work related to the railway police cycle was considered work that is separate from the mind of investment signed with companies or Considered Separate from compliance regulatory acts issued by the Governor and rela.

4. André , d. (s.d.). Treatise on Administrative Contracts. Tommy.

5. DALLOZ, W., & BRUBANT. (2003). LONG ADMINISTRATIVE JURISPRUDENCE.

6. decree concerning the data of candidates. (s.d.). FRANCE: For example, in France, the French Council of State accepted the separation of organizational work .

7. Farouk , M. M. (2014). Connected Business Theory and Discrete Business and its Applications in Administrative Disputes. Modern Book Foundation, Lebanon.

8. For example, in the early stages of detailed business theory. (s.d.). the review of the power that challenges the authority to form administrative contracts, whether from the party to the contract, from the following persons , or from third parties, was accepted.

9. Georgi , S. (s.d.). Irrigation of Decisions Inseparable in Administrative Law. Cairo: The Back of the Arab Renaissance.

10. However, for the successful application of this principle. (s.d.). be aware of all the elements of the dispute in order to be able to broadcast the review before him and to be able to take and annul the decision that occurs as a result of the act.

11. m. o. (1904).

12. Muhammad , S. M. (2013). the authority to cancel the administrative decisions that are separable. University Publishing House .

13. Muhammad Juma'a, S. M. (2013). Cancellation of Detachable Administrative Decisions. New University House .

14. Rabhi , A. (2013). Administrative Legal Works. Dar al-Kitab al-Hadith .

15. René , C. (2001). The Law of Administrative Dispute.

16. Richard , C. (1994). litigation of preparatory coronation in matters of political elections. . RF DA Vol August 10.

17. ROTHSCHILD. (2016). Wherein the Council, in this judgment, acknowledged that the postal administration is responsible for an error. ," Dar Al-Ayyam for Publishing and Distribution.

18. Shafik , S. (s.d.). separable decisions in administrative law.