The No Child Left Behind Act and the Black-White Achievement Gap
Mots-clés :
No Child Left Behind Act, Black-White Achievement GapRésumé
The present article probes into the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2002 and appraises its impact on closing the black-white achievement gap in American public education. Aiming at boosting academic achievement in schools across the United States, rising the performance of underprivileged students to the level of their more affluent counterparts and magnetizing qualified professionals to teach in every classroom, the NCLB is in effect the end product of a series of noteworthy embryonic and evolving key federal educational policies and reforms, recurring reauthorizations of previous laws, and suggested recommendations made out of a significant number of educational commissions and summits, from the foundation of the American Republic to the eve of its enactment in 2002. Despite considerable efforts to address racial disparities, millions of American students, particularly blacks, continue to attend schools that are not separate but grossly unequal in both resources and academic outcomes. Thus, appraisal of the changing rate of segregation against black students throughout the different levels of the K-12 Education, both before and after the enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act, helps answer the question of whether the NCLB lived up to the promise of closing the black-white achievement gap.Téléchargements
Références
« Boston Latin School. » Encyclopedia Britannica. Web. 26 Oct. 2010.
AAUW, Crossing the Line: Sexual Harassment in School 2, 12 (2011), available at: http://www.aauw.org/ files/2013/02/Crossing-the-Line-Sexual-Harassment-at-School.pdf
American Psychologi¬cal Association, Presidential Task Force on Educational Disparities Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understanding and reducing disparities 8 (2012), available at: http://www.apa. org/ed/resources/racial-disparities.aspx.
Casserly, Michael. “Commentary: Can the Bush School Plan Work?” Education Weekly 4 Dec. 2002: 48. Print.
Center for the Study of Mathematics Curriculum. A Nation at Risk : the Imperative for Educational Reform. National Commission on Excellence in Education 1983. 2005. Print.
Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights. Analysis of President George w. Bush’s Education Plan. Mar. 1, 2001: 5 <http://www.cccr.org/BushPlan.pdf>
Collins, Jim. Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don't (New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2001), 70. Print.
Cross, Christopher. “The Evolving Role of the Federal Government in Education.” Political Education: National Policy Comes of Age. New York: Teachers College Press, 2003. Print.
Dillon, Sam. “Thousands of Schools May Return Afoul of New Law.” New York Times 16 Feb. 2003: 33. Print.
Duran, James. « The Beginnings of Ambivalence: Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Federal Aid to Education Issue, 1949-1953. » Kansas History 13.3 (1990) : 166-177. Print.
Elmore, Richard F. “Testing Trap.” Harvard Magazine Sept.-Oct. 2002: 37.
Elmore, Richard L. « Introduction : On Changing the Structure of Public Schools. » in Restructuring Schools : The Next Generation of Educational Reform, ed. Richard F. Elmore. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1990. Print.
Greene, Jay P. “High School Graduation Rates in the United States” (report for Black Alliance for Educational Options, Washington, D.C., April 2002), 9.
Hoff, David J. “Debate Grows on True Costs of School Law.” Education Weekly 4 Feb. 2002: 1. Print.
Jacoby, Tamar. Someone Else’s House: America’s Unifinished Struggle for Integration. New York: Free Press, 1998. Print.
Jeffrey, Julie Roy. Education for Children of the Poor: A Study of the Origins and Implementation of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1978. Print.
Kress, Sandy, Stephanie Zechmann, and J. Matthew Schmitten. « When Performance Matters: The Past, Present, and Future of Consequential Accountability in Public Education. » Harvard Journal on Legislation 48 (2011): 187-188. Print.
Kucerick, Erwin. “The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Will it Live up to Its Promise?” Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy 9 (Summer 2002): 481, 484. Print.
Liebman, James S. and Charles F. Sabel. “The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Post-Desegregation Civil Rights Agenda.” North Carolina Law Review 81 (2003): 1721. Print.
Mathis, William J. “A Special Section on the Achievement Gap—Bridging the Achievement Gap: A Bridge Too Far?” Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 2005. Print.
Minor, Martha. “Just Education: An Essay for Frank Michelman.” Tulsa Law Review 39 (Spring 2004): 449-50. Print.
Munger, Frank J. and Richard F. Fenno. The National politics and Federal Aid to Education. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1962. Print.
Nash, David. “Improving No Child Left Behind: Achieving Excellence and Equity in Partnership with the States.” Rutgers Law Review 55 (Fall 2002): 240. Print.
National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) (2012). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Print.
Natriello, Gary and Edward L. McDill. “Title I: From Funding Mechanism to Educational Program.” Hard Work for Good Schools: Facts not Fads in Title I Reform. Harvard University, 1999: 33-34. Print.
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA). Pub. L. No. 107-110. Sec. 9110 (2002).
Orfield, Gary, John Kucsera, and Genevieve Siegel-Hawley, E Pluribus...Separation: Deepening Double Segre¬gation for More Students 20 (The Civil Rights Project, UCLA 2012), available at: http://civilrightsproject.ucla. edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-national/e-pluribus...separation-deepening-double-segregation-for-more-students/
Paige, Rod and Elaine Witty. The Black-White Achievement Gap: Why Closing It Is the Greatest Civil Rights Issue of Our Time. New York: American Management Association, 2010. Print.
Princiotta, Dan, Kristin Denton Flanagan, and Elvira Geromino Hausken, Fifth Grade: Findings from the Fifth Grade Follow-up of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–99 (ECLS-K), report for the U.S. Department of Education, National Center of Education Statistics, NCES-2006–038, March 2006, http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006038.pdf (accessed September 4, 2008).
Resnick, Daniel P. « Minimum Competency Testing Historically Considered. » Review of Research in Education 8. 3 (1980): 3, 17, 18. Print.
Rudalevidge, Andrew. “No Child Left Behind: Forging a Congressional Compromise.” No Child Left Behind? Eds. Paul E. Paterson and Martin R. West. Washington, D.C. : The Brookings Institute, 2003: 23. Print.
Ryan, James E. “The Perverse Incentives of the No Child Left Behind Act.” Public Law and Research Theory Research Papers: University of Virginia School of Law, 2003. Print.
Seligman, Dan. “Gapology 101,” Forbes, December 12, 2005, 120–122, http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2005/1212/120_print.html (accessed August 13, 2008).
Taylor, William L. “Assessment as a Means to a Quality Education.” Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy (2001): 312-13. Print.
Taylor, William L. “What Are the Likely Impacts of the Accountability Movement on Minority Children? Title I as an Instrument for Achieving Desegregation and Equal Educational Opportunity.” North Carolina Law Review 81 (May 2003): 1755-59. Print.
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. Still Segregated: How Race and Poverty Stymie the Right to Education. 3 September 2013. www.civilrights.org.
The National Defense Education Act (NDEA) (P.L. 85-864) 1958.
U.S. Department of Education, Graduation rates of first-time postsecondary students who started as full-time 22 degree/certificate-seeking students, by sex, race/ethnicity, time to completion, and level and control of institu¬tion where student started: Selected cohort entry years, 1996 through 2007, Digest of Education Statistics (2012), available at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d11/tables/dt11_345.asp
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, “The Nation's Report Card (Reading) National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8,” 2007, http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2007 (accessed August 13, 2008).
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, “The Nation's Report Card (Mathematics) National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8,” 2007, http://nationsreportcard.gov/math_2007 (accessed August 13, 2008).
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics, 2007, Table 192, 2007, 284–285.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, The Condition of Education, 2008, Table 25–3, 2008, 145.
U.S. Department of Education. “No Child Left Behind Standards and Assessments, Non-Regulatory Draft Guidance.” Mar. 10, 2003. http://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12r24.pdf
U.S. Department of Education. “The NCLBA of 2001.” Executive Summary. July 11. 2002 http://www.ed.gov./offices/OESE/esea/exec-summ.html
United States Department of Education. A Nation Accountable : Twenty-Five Years after a Nation at Risk. Washington ; D.C., 2008. Print.
Vinovskis, Maris A. « Do Federal Compensatory Education Programs Really Work? A Brief Historical Analysis of Title I and Head Start. » American Journal of Education 107.3 (1999): 187-209. Print.
Vinovskis, Maris A. The Road to Charlottesville : The 1989 Education Summit. U.S.A. : The National Education Goals Panel, 1999. Print.
Vinovskis, Maris. The Birth of Head Start: Preschool Education Policies in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008. Print.
Weckstein, Paul. “School Reform and Enforceable Rights to Quality Education.” Law & School Reform: Six Strategies for Promoting Educational Equity. Ed. Jay P. Herbert. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999: 328-29. Print.
