Enhancing Students’ Schematic Construction of Authentic-Based Generic Discoursal Structuring

Auteurs-es

  • Nour el Houda KHELOUFI University Frères Mentouri Constantine

Mots-clés :

Schematic knowledge, Discourse competence, Generic-based view, Discourse authenticity, Rhetorical-based view

Résumé

English language learners face many problems when processing the information especially in authentic contexts.  This issue carries a great importance in pedagogy as a crucial point to have discourse competence.  In this respect, this article reports on an experimental design which was conducted with 120 informants from the department of English (University of Mentouri Brothers-Constantine) divided into control and experimental groups in which learners of both groups were pre-tested and post-tested. The experiment checks the hypothetical criterion of testing the effect of the communicative nature of the authentic side of language on learners’ schematic knowledge.  Hence, it examines the aspect of enhancing learners’ discourse competence via a rhetorically authentic contextualisation of language. This is more particularly entailed in the different contextual factors as guidelines for the authenticity of communication. The comparison of the pre-test and the post-test results reveals a remarkable enhancement in the students’ schematic competence vis-à-vis the authentic use of language.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Nour el Houda KHELOUFI, University Frères Mentouri Constantine

Department of Letters and English Language

Références

- Brown, G and G, Yule. (1983).Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Celce-Murcia, M and Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and Context in Language Teaching: A Guide for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Cook, G. (2003). Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Coulthard, M. (1977). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman

- Halliday, M.A.K and R.Hasan. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

- Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Hyland, K and P, TSE. (2004). “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal” in Applied Linguistics. Volume 25/2: 156-177.

- Hymes, D. (1972). ‘On communicative Competence’. In: Pride, J.P.B. (ed.), Sociolinguistics. pp.269–293. England: Penguin Books.

- Johns, A.N. (ed.) (2002) Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum.

- Malmkiaer, K and J. Williams (eds.) (1998) Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..

- McCarthy, M. (2001). Issues in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing Discourse Analysis. London: Penguin Group.

- Paltridge, B. (2002). “Genre, Text Type, and the English for Academic Purposes EAP Classroom” in Johns (ed.), A.N. Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. pp.73-90. Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum.

- Swales. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Widdowson H.G (2007). Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2015-12-01

Comment citer

KHELOUFI, N. el H. (2015). Enhancing Students’ Schematic Construction of Authentic-Based Generic Discoursal Structuring. Revue Des Sciences Humaines, 26(4), 15–24. Consulté à l’adresse https://revue.umc.edu.dz/h/article/view/2466

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles

Articles similaires

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Vous pouvez également Lancer une recherche avancée d’articles similaires à cet article.